Ian J MacDonald.com digital marketing logo

Ian J MacDonald.com digital marketing



  • Categories

    • Ambient
    • Awards
    • Brand
    • Creative
    • Digital Marketing
    • Direct Marketing
    • eCRM
    • Marcomms
    • Mobile
    • Outdoor
    • Social Media
    • Television
    • Uncategorized
    • Usability
  • Recent Posts

    • A message from Banksy
    • Auto Trader Canada & DDB Win Big At The CASSIE Awards
    • Affiliate Marketing Comes To The Offline World With Checkout 51
    • Metro Misses the Mark
    • The Auto Trader Mobile Motorist Infographic
  • Archive

    • February 2013 (1)
    • January 2013 (2)
    • July 2012 (1)
    • February 2012 (2)
    • October 2011 (1)
    • September 2011 (2)
    • June 2011 (1)
    • May 2011 (2)
    • April 2011 (2)

Are UK Marketers Smarter Than Premier League Managers?

Filed under: Digital Marketing,Direct Marketing,Marcomms,Uncategorized,eCRM — Tags: Brand, General Consulting, Marcomms — Ian J MacDonald @ 2:14 pm

“I know half of my advertising doesn’t work…I just don’t know which half!”

John Wanamaker


So we all know the marketer’s quandary. How to attribute conversions and success back to media accurately. Now sure I know there are many more tools available today to try and decipher the riddle, like econometrics, cross visit participation, outright asking users how they heard of your site. But can anyone, hand on heart, say that they know the exact contribution and RoI from all their media?

Here’s a bit of fun for a Friday!

It often strikes me that media is lot like football. In a football team, players work together, in concert, to achieve two broad common objectives – score goals, minimise goals conceded.

In a marketing campaign, media work together, in concert, to achieve broad common objectives – such as increase market share and block out competitors.

Football players, like media, have different jobs to do. Can we map the roles?

Football roles and their media equivalents

Let’s look at some goals to explore this idea.
Extending my analogy we could say that this is an example of TV (defender) ‘winning the ball’ ie generating awareness, and then perhaps frequency being built by exposure to outdoor, and radio, (a pass from midfielder Fabregas to midfielder Nasri) culminating in PPC (forward, Arshavin) converting a brand or brand+generic search because it was a great shot but he was in the right place, at the right time. Just like appearing in the SERPs at the right time to harvest latent consideration caused by ad exposure frequency.

If we looked at a different goal, say a midfielder scoring from range, I would say this is a user clicking through on a display ad. A rare thing, but it does happen! A midfielder who creates and scores goals himself is like a great DR display campaign.

What is the point I am trying to make? Well, on average, who is best paid in a football team? Below is the average salary for different roles in a Premier League football team according to a PFA survey in 2006. OK, a bit of date! It’s probably twice or three times this now, but it’s still true that strikers are paid more than defenders for example. If you were to apply the same ‘attribution’ to a marketing budget of £10M, I have shown what your breakdown would be. Looking a bit heavy on PPC! Does that mean that managers are suffering from last clickitus?

John Terry - the TV of football

John Terry is like a great TV campaign, primarily winning the ball (awareness) yet contributing with goals (direct response to website)

Filippo Inzaghi the PPC of football

A player like Filippo Inzaghi, a legendary poacher in the box, would be the PPC or SEO of football, converting chances (consideration) created by midfielders (online display).

Premier League Football salaries by position

The fact is, we will never know the whole story of what contributes to a conversion, just as we never really know who contributes to a football victory. It’s the sum of the parts and has a million influencing factors. But one thing is certain. No one ever won a football match by putting out eleven strikers. No one ever won a match putting out eleven defenders. You should be tailoring your mix according to your sector, market position and strategic objectives.

Evolved marketing is about testing, learning and refining. Every now and then, eliminate a media from the mix and observe the results. In this way you can arrive at stats like the one that says that over 50 games, Arsenal averaged 2.1 points when Fabregas played, but only 1.75 when he didn’t play. Sure, still fallible, and many other factors may be involved, but more robust than instinct alone. Can you replicate this type of insight in your media mix?

Lastly, before we beat ourselves up about attribution, if you looked at UK adspend by media ‘forwards’ only represent about 18% of the total mix, so you could say marketers are actually doing a better job of attribution than Premiership football managers, with equally mystifying attribution problems to solve. What do you think? Does treating your marketing campaign like a football match make it more fun!?

Share

8 Responses to “Are UK Marketers Smarter Than Premier League Managers?”

  1. Chase Watts Says:
    October 19th, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    Great post! Keep up the awesome work!

  2. Reba Tilly Says:
    October 23rd, 2011 at 8:04 pm

    Wonderful job with these posts. They are very informative.

  3. Karmen Provencio Says:
    October 27th, 2011 at 9:11 am

    Terrific post. Thanks a lot. You should keep posting.

  4. Acnebehandlingar Says:
    November 1st, 2011 at 6:51 pm

    hi-ya. Great post and a fantastic blog

  5. Melaine Maarx Says:
    November 24th, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    Compliments for this post, I am glad I noticed this website on yahoo.

  6. Joshua Baugus Says:
    January 28th, 2012 at 2:05 am

    Hello, This is a really nice looking site. Are you a website designer or did someone make this lovely design for you?

  7. Hoa Says:
    January 29th, 2012 at 9:59 am

    Lol nice.

  8. carrie Says:
    January 29th, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    Highly interesting post.

Leave a Reply

Just how important is usability?

Filed under: Digital Marketing,Marcomms,Mobile,Usability — Tags: General Consulting, Marcomms, mobile, usability, UX, website — Ian J MacDonald @ 7:53 pm

Recently New Media Age asked me to comment on the importance of usability, specifically across multiple channels. To most of us, that means mobile and online! Below you’ll find my thoughts on this.

What are some of the key areas that usability can affect in digital marketing?

Usability is everything in digital marketing where a digital product or service is involved. There is very little point in optimising your acquisition costs if you are not optimising your conversion ratio through optimising usability.

What challenges does the growing number of mobile devices pose in terms of usability – what is the best approach to ensure a smooth user experience across devices?

One year ago, a brands biggest focus should have been having a mobile optimised site. The fact that so many still do not have this is rather worrying for UK marketers. A staggering 79% at the last estimate are not optimised for mobile despite data suggesting mobile will overtake desktop for internet usage by 2015. The clock is ticking!

But for those that do have mobile optimisation, usability now means delivering the seamless experience that users expect across platforms. As cookies alone will not yet allow marketers to identify the same user across platforms the answer is surely to create a compelling value proposition for registration and use shared cross platform registration data to provide a relevant and contextualised experience to a given user, whatever device they happen to be using at that moment.

How has the role of usability and user experience evolved over the past year, and how is it being integrated – both agency, and client side?

The role has expanded as tools like eye tracking have become slightly more affordable, but chiefly because of the increasing cost per acquisition in cluttered media environments and thus the need to increase conversion.

The take up and application of such techniques appears to be a little overlooked by digital creative agencies and perhaps rightly so – the best place for a UX team is most definitely client side where the team will have the proper connections to the web development pipeline to implement their recommendations and MVT tests.

As alluded to earlier, UX importance becomes more pronounced as cost of acquisition increases, for example general media inflation in the year of the olympics or lower disposable income meaning it’s harder to convert users to purchase.

Do you feel usability should be taking more seriously, or is the industry already recognising its value in the digital mix?

It needs to be taken more seriously. I would like to see a day where brands in search of revenue growth first look to increase conversion of their existing traffic, or increase the yield (basket value) of existing conversions, before splashing out to drive more traffic to the top of the funnel. Surely usability should be the first port of call, followed by upweighted acquisition, after all acquistion is only one aspect of the holy trinity for marketers; acquisition, conversion and retention all being optimised is what leads to massive uplifts in traffic, conversions, recommendation, yield per user, and ultimately, the bottom line.

Share

2 Responses to “Just how important is usability?”

  1. ZibreviewVide Says:
    September 27th, 2011 at 5:57 pm

    It is remarkable, very good piece

  2. Philip Fabin Says:
    October 11th, 2011 at 11:43 pm

    I just wanted to comment and say that I really enjoyed reading your blog post here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I’ll be back to read more in the future

Leave a Reply

The Importance of Continuity Planning And The Voice Of the Customer – Just Ask Sony

Filed under: Marcomms,eCRM — Tags: Brand, General Consulting, Marcomms, PR — Ian J MacDonald @ 1:00 pm

By now everyone is aware of the data breach of Sony’s Playstation Network. I say by now, because this time last week you might not have been. Millions of online gamers, myself included, found the Playstation Network ‘unavailable’ since 19th April, with no real explanation given. A technical hitch of some sort? We should be so lucky.

When the full horror of the situation emerged, that actually Sony had been the victim of potentially the biggest data security breach in history, it was almost a full week later. Almost a full week.

Given the fact that usernames, emails, passwords and most crucially (potentially) credit card details had been lost, this represents an absolutely unacceptable delay. With so many online accounts for users to manage these days, people often use the same password across multiple accounts for ease of memory. So when an email and password for one account is compromised, the security risk is like a pebble thrown in a pond. And the ripples aren’t pretty. Victims of the monster.co.uk data breach a few years ago will remember finding their facebook and twitter accounts posting spam and virus laden links to their peer network, if they shared a password across monster and twitter or facebook.

Sony may or may not be to blame for the hacking attack. But what they are definitely guilty of, is poor continuity planning and even poorer customer focus.

The damage to the brand has been amplified by the poor crisis communications strategy. Sony’s official line is that they had to find out whether user data had actually been lost before communicating. Sorry, that’s not good enough. If there’s even a chance of it, they should have comunicated ASAP.

Speak For Your Customers
In the war room that no doubt was hastily assembled at Sony HQ on the 19th, where was the customer champion? Who was the one in the room representing customers? I’ve been in similar situations, and whilst technology teams might want to keep shtum and put collective heads int he sand, as marketers it is our role to say that is absolutely not acceptable. Especially now, with platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and blogs. Customers can ask questions directly and quickly. A good customer focussed brand needs to answer them. Swift communication is not only key to protecting the brand, but is also frankly non-negotiable. To not give customers the warning to change their passwords on other accounts until 6 days later is utterly unacceptable.

What We Can Learn From This
The lesson in all this is two fold. Number One, make sure you have continuity plans in place, with solid and accountable action plans. If the worst happened over a bank holiday weekend for your brand, what would happen? Do you know who would do what, and when? If you don’t, you are putting yourself in a vulnerable position. Number two, be the voice of the customer. I often preach that everyone in a business is a marketer in some way. Everyone has the power to influence an element of the marketing mix, whether that’s the guy who cleans the washroom influencing physical evidence or IT team influencing product reliability. But as marketers, we really are the ones who should have the customer at the front of our minds, and speak for them. It might not always be popular in the boardroom (or the war room) but customers pay the bills, and any brand which disrespects that, will regret it at their leisure.

Never be afraid to be the one who says, “if I was a customer, would 6 days in the dark be acceptable to me?” If it wouldn’t be, don’t let it be so. Someone at Sony should have put the customer first and insisted on customer communication as an order of absolute priority. It’s not the crisis which is remembered – it’s how a brand dealt with it. In this case, that’s not good news for Sony.

Share

Leave a Reply

Sitemap